This paper presents a case about business-to-business marketing and the promotional approaches used by Microsoft Company to buttress the introduction of a new Internet service platform known as Office Live. In this package, Microsoft Corporation aims to assist medium and small-scale businesses in helping them tap the benefits of Web-based marketing useful in enhancing and developing a business. To attain this marketing idea, Microsoft engaged the services of Rovion Inc. to execute this online advertisement and marketing platform. Concisely, the case unfolds a series of responses from marketing professionals and other analysis on this new drive, and it states the effects resulting from the use of Office Live on businesses. The case explores the market for online-based services, the Web-enabled programme for medium and small enterprises, and competitive nature in this segment. The paper shall also offer alternative insights on Microsofts move to provide Web-based services and how this shall move shall pan out from the fierce competition the company exhibits from technology giants such as Yahoo and Google. The context of the case making it attractive is that Microsoft was able to identify the problem faced by small companies to have affordable online marketing platforms. As a technology vendor, the company moved with speed to ensure that they tap the new market and that formed a fundamental strategy to increase the sales of the company and also an opportunity to realize growth resulting from new move to capture and offer services to such groups. It is fascinating that Microsoft was able to launch new online-based marketing software to help such small businesses accomplish their potential.
Marketing Office Live to Small Businesses
Late 2006, Microsoft, one of the biggest software firms, introduced a web-based ad campaign to help small business engage in online marketing and interactions with potential customers. Primarily, Office Live, which earlier existed in beta-test phase from February 2006, had the opportunity to reach the market. With this kind of launch, the company primarily target small enterprises that rarely use any business software to carry out their daily operations (Anderson et al., 2009). The service was meant to act as a game changer for such small and medium businesses that hardly apply any software in their market activities. Technology is critical for companies in the contemporary business world, and with this kind of idea, Microsoft hoped to solve and efficiently increase the operations of such business that could not afford such software in their activities. The Office would help the medium and small enterprises to make a presence on the Web as well as market the entire business in the online world. The creativity of Microsoft would lead to the provision of a free entry-level package, Office Live Basic, while the other two sets would be available upon subscription ((Anderson et al., 2009).
The promotional platform created by Rovion Inc. enabled the client's display video clips of the individuals who appeared as though they were openly networking with the web visitors. The pictures relayed were without borders and seemed to integrate flawlessly with the web page contents. In fact, the technology appears similar to the one termed green screen typically used in television and movies to create special effects (Vitale, 2011). This technology espoused a clear Flash window within the Internet pages that make the actor seeming to be on top of another composition of the same page while talking to the visitor on that particular page. Michael Schultz, the chief marketing lead for this new service expressed optimism that the Office Live is one of the affordable and more accessible approaches for small and medium enterprises to market their products online (Slywotzky et al., 2007). The technology provided by Rovion Inc. was efficient and wholesomely targeted customers innovatively on how they apply Office Live to charm new clients and replicate the same kind of successful business by having a professional Internet presence (Slywotzky et al., 2007). The technology also faced significant criticism from some groups. Even though some experts viewed this new online marketing as an innovative approach, some critiques resented by suggesting that such ad would be intrusive and may generate aggravation to the online visitors (Anderson et al., 2009). It is normal that expert has divergent views on such aspects as this one about Office Live. However, the small business would reap the benefits of employing the services of this online ad software. For example, when the Office Live was in beta phase, many experts were disappointed after noticing that the software would not be part of Microsoft Office, as the name appeared to infer. Some felt that spreading Microsoft Office to Office Live would seem like a branding blooper and thus unwarranted. Other felt that much should not be interpreted from the free package made by the company as they view it as a strategy to attract new customers for the new software services (Michel et al., 2002). As a matter of fact, promoting and its practices, notably publicizing and offering, have dependably been subjects of feedback and debate. Some of these grievances backpedal similar to the Book of scriptures, Confucius, and established Greek writing. All the more as of late, the presentation of "individual antiperspirants" in the 1960s was profoundly dubiousboth the possibility of the item itself and the way it was promoted. In the 1970s, there was great feedback of "war toys," publicizing went for youngsters, and the advancement of infant equation in Africa. Today its garbage mail, the glorification to the youthful of hedonic ways of life, and the sheer wealth and meddling of business interchanges.
Feedback of promoting centers to a great extent around two regions: its "overabundances" and its "expertness." "Abundances" are about intentionally poor and shocking items, deficient guarantees, beguiling or offensive publicizing, misdirecting bundling, sketchy offering practices, and accentuation on crude esteems. These are the premise of what's comprehensively alluded to as the "purchaser development," or "consumerism."
"Expertness" alludes to the different ways showcasing considers and methodologies customers. A great many people characterize purchaser needs or needs regarding items and their functional traitswhat a thing does how it performs, tastes, or looks. Advertisers do likewise, however substantially more. They consider additionally how items present as far as customers' mental and psychosocial needs and wishes. These tend to be unpredictable, inconspicuous, and manipulatable. People frequently don't see any requirement for specific items until the point that they have been influentially presented to the likelihood of having themand it is advertising specialists who expertly do the influencing. At the point when a specialist goes up against a novice, particularly when cash is included, the general feeling is that it's unreasonable
How Microsoft Solved the Problem
Through the introduction, of this new ad platform, Office Live, Microsoft bolstered the focus they have on small and medium enterprise software market. The intention was to improve the nature of business the company enjoys with other small firms. The company viewed this as a chance or critical growth and expansion since large parts of the market had stayed untapped by other technology vendors (Gupta et al., 2013). The period was also essential since many businesses were set up and business opportunities continued to grow, and a large chunk of them would need a relatively affordable software to help them market their products and enterprises at large (Anderson et al., 2009). Schultz accepted that indeed Microsoft was making significant strategic steps in the small and medium enterprise segment (Slywotzky et al., 2007). The company was also concentrating on incorporating Web-based actions in the new software as part of a crucial strategic move by the company towards having Web-based services. In a nutshell, this appears as an attempt to counter the efforts as well as the advantages enjoyed by other technology vendors such as Yahoo and Google in this Internet period. According to Microsofts views, businesses that own at most 25 computers with less than 50 workforces were categorized as small enterprises while enterprises with networks between 25 and 50 or employees of between 50 and 100 were regarded as medium-sized businesses (Slywotzky et al., 2007). These two types of companies as categorized by the group were considered as those having similar operational needs, and the new Office Live software would efficiently address such needs. In their views, the primary business of small and medium enterprises would entail how to efficiently manage and track cash flows, engage with the new customers, as well as improving sales from the existing clients (Anderson et al., 2009). Therefore, effective business-to-business marketing to such enterprises would be a great way to expand the business.
The competitive landscape for the provision of web hosting was rife, and the Microsoft took a bold step to join the new market. Web hosting witnessed a robust competition and many firms fighting for the small and medium enterprise markets. For example, Yahoo costs for small enterprise hosting service roughly stand at $12 every month (Slywotzky et al., 2007). It appears likely that Office Live platform would be a massive revenue generator through the acts of subscription fee and advertising roles for Microsoft in the possible event that small firms stay attached to this new software. Microsoft would also ensure that the new platform, Office Live would maintain a client-focused approach by concentrating on the user-friendly features and incorporated experiences across the products and services (Anderson et al., 2009). Also, the company would venture into establishing further marketing and other sales services to small-sized enterprises need and offer substantial customization support on the newly created Office Live.
Another way that the problem was solved was through using Michael Porters concept, which encompasses a strategy where a firm or business implement some serious planning actions in the view to defend itself in the industry and stay competitive with the kinds of products and services they offer (Schmitt, 2000). This approach can both be offensive and defensive towards the position they have chosen to take in the industry. The Porters concept provides an advantage of the companies that employ them over their competitors by providing their customers with value by either reducing the cost of products or services they offer or having products that entail more unique features deemed appropriate to the customers. The same can be witnessed in the Microsoft product, Office Live which has fundamental features to attract the clients. The small businesses have found the new Web-based platform useful for marketing their businesses. The strategies of cost leadership and differentiation approach best explain the case scenario. The cost leadership touches on ensuring competitive advantage, and it does this by expanding the profit margins and reducing the cost of production thus making the firm realize a lot of profit. Office Live is relatively cheap while also providing fundamental features to business that employs this platform in their operations. All these strategies conspire to make Microsoft have better services, software, and other innovative solutions in the business context to reach people and enterprises to help...
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the thesishelpers.org website, please click below to request its removal:
- Paper Example on Marketing Mix
- Fashion Marketing Trends - Marketing Essay Example
- Financial Effect of Consumer Greed on a Business - Term Paper Example
- Pro-Analysis Measurement Tool (PAMT): A New Model of Measuring Social Marketing Effectiveness
- Research and Development Plan of Juicy Lucys - Paper Example
- Research Paper Sample on the Underlying Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior of iPhone Users
- Essay on Mixed Market vs. Central Planning