Revolutionizing Intellectual Property Laws: The Internet's Impact

The revolution of the internet has advanced in a way that it has changed the way people think. Several other tools have also changed the perception of people. However, when the Internet and computing spread, it became hard to apply the traditional intellectual property laws. This is because the internet made it easy to distribute information at the simplest level due to the triangulated nervous system, as well as the touch or the synapses and nerves brought by the chaotic and changing world (Ballano, 2016). The internet also transformed the collective capacity of people's curiosities and imaginations.

The archives and libraries are now left to wonder how everything is on people's fingertips. The internet has also brought abundance and exhilaration of the less common things that are delivered by the deliberating and factious intensity of personalized issues in the electronic discussion list. This shows that the extraordinary feats of electronic altruism and generosity when everyone shares enormous information are also exposed to warnings on narcissism due to blogging (Ballano, 2016). The internet has also changed how the world became present to everyone and how people became present to the world.

The internet has also expanded the horizons of every expressive or utterance to a planetary level. By this, it means that there is a possibility of someone to imagine about any local context and still create it today (Lanteigne, 2013). The existence of the internet also has de-centered ideas on the global and the privilege of someone's location. In other words, in the world we live in, no place is less or more centered that where everyone lives because most people that sensed their intellectual margins also came from a contemporary world all because of geopolitical arrangements.

The internet has also changed the significance, import and the worth to the point that statements are no longer tied to the real facts of a person's position that is unequal to the geopolitical map. The availability of various registers the manifestation of the internet has also come up with continuous archives of the online inscriptions and presences. In short, every time a message is sent, it is usually archived (Lanteigne, 2013). The generation of internal files of the public records and work such as Facebook has changed how people think. Everyone, in this case, is accountable for what has been posted online for or written on the emails. However, no one has a full sense of long-term impact.

The automatic generation of history or chronicle colors has consigned to amnesia even if it appears to be insignificant. However, no matter how important the statement may be when it was first uttered, its significance must also be compromised with the filed facts similar to other pebbles, datum, and the growing mountain range (Wiederhold, 2018). The person that maintains the archives, in this case, has an awareness of the visible terms. In the past, for instance, the visibility was always assumed as the default mode of practice and life, but today the default mode has turned out to be a unique aspect that withholds aspects of someone's practice from visibility.

Most changes that take place are usually assumed that they form a special relationship between the public presence and unique memory. This is not a matter of whether there is a loss of privacy for intimacy but issues on inclusion and publicity and how they affect people. The internet also changes how people think when it comes to information (Wiederhold, 2018). Even though people know that something exists in the extent of human expansive does not mean that it should intimidate people into reticence. In other words, when one knows something, their partner does not know, and such ways shared on the internet because it gives a leeway of perceiving things.

One example is piracy. In a simple definition, copying is the duplication of unauthorized things by other people. In most circumstances, one knows whether there is piracy because the items produced are tangible and in most situations, they are easy to solve. However, intellectual property like media messages and inventions become more challenging to define because the owner is unknown, and so encourages piracy. On one side of the debate, theft is a debate that is highly volatile because of the terms and people engaged when it comes to the media messages.

Usually, people regard media messages such as commercial products in a traditional view. Others see the media messages as amorphous entities that have a flow of information. When these viewpoints are observed, they tend to clash because it is hard to determine whether media messages are creative or have ownership (Malin, 2017). In most cases, traditionalists regarded the media messages commercial products designed by artists such as novelists, producers, and rock stars and marketed and packaged by the media businesses. These marketers and creators develop traditional ownership of such information and charge consumers for access. Most of them claim that they must be paid for their efforts and talents and that why they protect their rights when it comes to accessing their messages. Most creators and marketers establish their rights through copyrights.

When creators copyright their messages (books, movies, song, etc.), they ensure their words are registered with the Library of Congress to ensure that their ownership is established (Malin, 2017). Most owners also end up selling their words to the publishers so that the consumers may access. As a result, they benefit financially because many customers purchase their products. Under this view, media piracy comes in three forms: the sharing of copyrighted messages, counterfeiting and bootlegging.

In the past, newspapers were designed by patriots and business people for political involvement elite. However, when the new movie industry was generated by the entrepreneurs that wanted to make money, they were guided and predetermined by the radio industry. Unlike the TV whose growth and birth were guided and predestined by using a similar culture from cinemas (Merwe, 2011). In other words, people became literate in the literature after they understood the cinematic alterations concerning place and time. Most of them learned how sound and images were combined to come up with a meaning. However, when the internet emerged people began seeing the projected and sequential slides in pictures as if they were in motion form (Merwe, 2011). This also resulted in a psychological phenomenon called the persistence of vision because the images seen in people's eyes were magnified. Therefore, whenever the pictures were moved within a 24-hour speed, a motion was formed.

A similar argument arose over technologies like recordable CDs and minidisc. The only thing that terrified the music industry was the arrival of the Audio Galaxy and Napster because it made people for sharing music over the internet with no cost. These developments horrified the music industry because everyone was exchanging digital copies and transferring them without being noticed. Therefore, if people still claim that the internet never killed the music industry, what did if most labels and musicians looked rosy? For many years, music has always been on demand, and most people are wired to musical patterns and beats.

The answer to what killed the music label is the record label because they acted in the middle to ensure that it fights direct and online shopping (Macy, 2010). A similar issue has also hit the TV content companies despite them having confidence in the future. A Good example is Netflix. While it is valued 250 times due to annual profits, it also trends in the worrisome path because many customers are extracting less revenue (Macy, 2010). This is because most physical products have become digital and this has made many spoilers not to pay but instead get them for free.

A world where people don't pay with money usually has the assumption that attention is needed. Approximately 80 percent of apps, music industries, and news focus believing advertising is the most effective way of passing messages. Even though newspapers managed to create content for the readers, most of them have also relied on advertisement as a platform for moving the word. With this said, it is clear that the internet facilitates most of the ads.

The increase in view ship led to the introduction of television on the internet because of piracy and copyright concerns. Most viewers had sufficient bandwidth that brought the content into their homes. After several years, videos on the net had short transmissions like the music video, news clips, and short independent films. However, the development became sophisticated because of the compression of the video software and the rise of homes that had broadband internet connections. This made about 63.3% of Americans to put broadband networks at home because it gave out more information due to the carrying capacity (Lanteigne, 2013). Today, watching television on the internet has become a norm because much of its content travels through cable television and network.

The advancement of the internet not only did it permit interactivity but also made viewers talk back to the tent providers. Later, the digital images, digital cable television, and other subscribers developed interactive television. In the U.S for instance, more than 45 million citizens are digital cable subscribers. The majority of them also use cable connections to access the internet (Lanteigne, 2013). Today users that have new cable connections are also connected to the internet through the service providers.

The advantages of the digital channels are that it allows multiplexing by carrying various signals to the same channel. The digital also facilitates digital compression by squeezing the messages to enable several signs to be transmitted into a single platform. In other words, digital compression operates by removing the redundant information that is sent through the message. For instance, in a movie scene, a set of two actors remains the same for several minutes because the transmission of the digital data has to show that it is changing the scene. The expansion also develops the interactive cable (ability to make the subscribers talk back to the system) because it holds extra space on the same channel the talkback is used.

It is evident that today 48% of American adults use the internet to watch videos. Most of them use mobile devices. Teens, in this case, are known to the most massive consumers because every month they spend several hours paying attention to the internet. Tablets and Smartphone's as much they are used for other media have also made it easier for people to watch television, anytime, anywhere. The two also have two other developments. First is the popularity of handheld demand like the Sony Play station and the Nintendo game boy advance. Such games streamed videos and played using video cartridges or discs. Secondly TV is everywhere, and its content is with every provider.

Most of them put a lot of effort to make digital be on demand by making the programs available to all mobile phones. This has made users such as Comcast, broadcast and Verizon networks like CBS and Fox. Moreover, over 900 public broadcasters and air-commercial use the Open Mobile Video Coalition to make their signals spread to all TV stations. With such mobile views, most activities have been altered because most users spend their time on their devices. Research has shown that about 39% use their mobile devices to watch TV programs. The remaining numbers turn to their televisions mostly to view the news (Macy, 2010). This is because video can be dramatic and immediate if event covered have visual images. However, most TV news people are obligated to accurate and truthful information to att...