There is always a cause whose a call to action holds common human rights agenda. People who want to see change shoulder the responsibility to communicate the problem as they perceive it. The pitching that follows rallies people together behind a common cause. United in their vision, it becomes easier to clarify demands (Ackerly, 2008). Strategies continually review for their ability to convince, inspire and challenge those outside the movement that they too can use their power to demand change. Leadership continues to be needed. This work concerns itself with the general community approach to demanding resources, specific investment, and political will in strengthening the tenets of human rights. Human rights campaigns are about speaking loudly and consistently backed by evidence and experience.
The good intentions of the pioneering activists do not form a robust strategy to achieve vital human rights principles and norms. Often, achieving the goal of a just society also needs well-coordinated and funded strategies by international not-for-profit organizations, philanthropic individuals, civil society and communities. The effectiveness of these strategies should be assured through actions that all the stakeholders should commit to uphold (Ackerly, 2008). Examples of such actions include; changing norms, showing leadership, advocating for equality, investing time to research and assess trends, and challenging sectors. All these techniques are aimed at starting activism around issues.
Speaking out gets the community to notice, reflect, and take action. For instance, when the action plan chosen involves changing norms, investing in rights abuse programming is inevitable. The result is the promotion of human rights. Therefore, a community is empowered to challenge social norms that support discrimination and passive approval of injustices. Additionally, the community becomes able to identify and develop interventions to change these norms that uphold injustices. Outreach programs engaged in at this stage is typically geared towards supporting victims of injustices and address risk factors for instance exposure to human rights abuse during one's youth.
Every strategy employed forms tools that deliver the desired output. Campaigns and more so human rights campaign are not without friction with the political powers. Governments are increasingly now required to secure their citizens. In doing this, security agencies are perceived to step on the rights enshrined in the constitutions they swore to protect. Terror suspects arrested for questioning may in the course of extracting information from them, be treated in an inhumane way. While some of the methods may be inexcusable in these age of technology, human rights campaigns somewhat ignore the greater good being pursued. When governments outlaw gatherings maybe to avert security threats posed, human rights activists see it differently. The perception is that governments actions are part of a ploy to continually deny a citizen their rights. Human rights campaign is a constant threat to communities and governments. Shifting focus on the individuals who lead these community causes for the sake of justice, they are viewed and rebellious individuals yet, whatever goal they seek to achieve benefits all.
In conclusion, if there is a cause that could serve to strengthen human rights; start today, get organized, to invite others to work in the campaign to create a more significant action, and develop a clear and strategic approach. Human rights campaign focus on communicating their purpose consistently. Therefore, it is prudent for human rights champions to continually focus on what their group does best (Thrall, Stecula & Sweet, 2014). Staying informed about the state of human rights is also necessary coupled with documenting and evaluating the campaigns methods. The campaign should have everyone empowered to prevent and respond to injustices.
Ackerly, B. (2008). Universal human rights in a world of difference. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Thrall, A., Stecula, D., & Sweet, D. (2014). May We Have Your Attention Please? Human-Rights NGOs and the Problem of Global Communication. The International Journal Of Press/Politics, 19(2), 135-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1940161213519132
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the thesishelpers.org website, please click below to request its removal:
- Cultural Interview on Intercultural Communication
- Movie Review Example: Digital Nation
- Sociology Essay Example: Veterans and Poverty in the U.S
- Research Paper on Universal Basic Income
- Essay Example: Characteristic of New Urbanism
- The Psychology of Political Violence - Essay Example
- Political Principles by Aristotle - An Essay Example