Conflict and Decision Making - Essay on International Relations

Overseeing a military operation requires the participants to intervene in a conflict within a nation by applying a necessary force to suppress the militia groups that may threaten peace in a country. The Libyan government was executing citizens who were opposing the dictatorship regime, a situation that prompted NATO to intervene and recommend immediate cease-fire to protect the innocent civilians (Aljazeera, 2011). Various nations had controversial agreement on how to carry out this mission with minimal causalities. The main issues during this activity were to consolidate efforts by Americana and European countries to implement the no-fly zone in Libya. Some nations such as Russian by the then prime minister who the current president wanted to engage the government by firing bombs. However, countries such as France and USA were cautious on violating the international sovereignty of nations. At first, Turkey refused to join the mission in Libya but later agreed since the mission was of international concern. For such instances, the application of force would not solve the matter but would stir more violence and jeopardize the actual mission and lead to loss of more lives and destruction of property. Each nation has a right to self-governance and external force should intervene concerning the international standards for crisis management. For a nation to participate in a peace mission in regions they must be both members of an international organization to have the basis of interaction and agreement. For instance, Libya as a member of NATO requires intervention from members of the same body. This is because such member has a common ground for engagement with Libya and may not be seen a violation of a nations autonomy or sovereign powers. Another consideration the prescriptions of the international laws, for instance, those protecting human rights. The Libyan government had committed crimes against humanity by using violence to deter opposition. This is unacceptable and may prompt the international community to intervene. The Arab league was ignorant of the matters in Lydia, and this is why European nations and USA took the active role to manage the situation.

The effectiveness of a nation to participate in a conflict like that depends on various aspects which include, interest towards the nation, military power, its national stability, and diplomatic ties with the nation. Interest towards a nation should be good and beneficial towards the nation in conflict. It was very disappointing to realize that Putin the Russian prime minister was interested in worsening the conflict in Libya by launching more war to suppress Gadhafi. When he was later asked why he intended to go that malicious path, he declined the claims. This shows that he was aware that his plan would not have worked and a more diplomatic and peaceful way would have been the better solution for the situation. Therefore having good interests that are unquestionable is s standard measure to establish the fitness to participate in such a mission. Gadhafi had an organized military which he was using to suppress his opponents by killing the civilians. Therefore to engage in such a mission having military stability is a prerequisite. The importance of this aspect is that if he decides that killing civilians is the only way, then he has to be suppressed. This is the reason why the USA has to call upon Russian and France, and Turkey among other nations to support the no-fly zone policy. This shows that the military strength that was required to contain Gadhafi and his soldiers were tremendous and so all available forces were needed at the moment. National stability is another aspect to consider before trying to intervene in chaos in another country. It is logical to handle issues at home to understand what it takes to have a peaceful atmosphere or how to facilitate it. It would be very ironical that a nation at war goes to promote peace in another. The head os Turkish government when he was asked to support the no-fly zone in Libya he openly refused to do anything that contradicted the regime of Gadhafi. This was because of the diplomatic ties the two nations were enjoying. He later agree to take part in the mission as he realized that Gadhafi was violating human rights and therefore had to be stopped by all means. The reason for diplomatic ties is to create that personal relationship which may be effective in handling a situation. Turkey was the hope for diplomatic negotiations to end the war, but this was not successful.

Diplomatic leadership skill is the most valuable to use in this context. This skill requires a person to negotiate, present interest and policies and openly speaking to end the conflict. For instance, the rule in Libya was to be informed that his crime against humanity can be tried at the international criminal court but stopping would grant him amnesty. The democratic leadership skill helps to build relationships that are expected to solve a conflict (Melissen, 2005). This means that the perpetrators of a bad situation will be expected to accept their involvement in crime and purpose to reform. The skill allows a person to identify the positive elements of the person on the wrong as a motivation to make reconciliatory efforts. For instance, informing Gadhafi that he was doing great as a leader and that accommodating democracy as a way of life in the 21sts century is inevitable would be a good diplomatic idea. This would ignite thoughts that would inspire a change of heart and stop the authorization of killing the civilians who opposed his government. A diplomatic leader preaches the same value he observes, and therefore it is vital to be democratic and have evidence for it before approaching other to convince them to accommodate the new political trend sweeping the world. Through the talks, Gadhafi could have been convinced to run for the presidency and that based on his stable leadership more people might have preferred him for having known his working mechanisms.

In conclusion, to engage in a peacekeeping mission in a foreign nations various elements such as interest towards the nation, military power, its national stability, and diplomatic ties with the nation should be considered. In such situations, democratic leadership skills are needed to solve the conflict. Gadhafi had been accused of widespread chaos in Libya that involved military killing citizens that opposed his government. This was inappropriate, but still, no nation had a right to open fire in a foreign sovereign state. This is why NATO nations came to oversee the issue and sort close ties such as Turkey to help with the mater. However, Gadhafis downfall was due to his adamant nature to listen to the international community.

References

Aljazeera (2011, March 23). Questions remain over NATO role in Libya. Retrieved December 02, 2017, from http://www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2011/03/2011322181336891487.htmlMelissen, J. (Ed.). (2005). The new public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations. Springer.