Should We Go to War with North Korea? Paper Example

When discussing issues concerning the position on whether to go to war with Korea, we should not only view it in economic, political and social perspective but also in deontology perspective. Deontology refers to the technique of approach that focuses on the important perspectives regarding the development of the ethical balance, in most cases, it is based on the good intentions as well as the inherent value of the person. The objective of the following research paper will be focusing on the current controversies, Kantian's deontology together with the personal perspective on whether we should go to war with North Korea.

Trumps administration has experienced the mixed reaction from the public as well as experts on the position of United States invading North Korea. Those who support it claims to claim that: if North Korea nuclear weapon poses a risk to the global security and if they are spared they will attack us soon. On the other hand, the one who is against the claim that they can opt diplomacy first, and also fight North Korea will stimulate war with Russia and China ("Should America Go To War With North Korea- web n.p).

Kantians ethical concepts and theories are based on the fact that, the wrongness and the rightness lie in fulfilling our duty, rather than the consequences (Amstutz 75). According to the Kantians point of view, there is a supreme principle of morality, known as the Categorical Imperative that is based on defining our moral duties. Based on Categorical Imperative, we have the moral obligation that controls our acts, since we have to be an excellent example to the world, by deterring war, then we should be the one to start it. We need to be the role model instead of being the stimulators of war. Categorical Imperative is related to morality such that, we are controlled by morality in the manner that we cannot opt out of it and refuse that it no longer applies to us. The Kantian claim that was will lead to suffering, but still, oppression should be ended (Amstutz 76). It means that other means can be applied such as diplomacy to ensure that North Korea abide by the international security regulation.

According to us, as a group, the most satisfying ethical solution includes the following: It will bring unjust structured society, whereby, there will be racial segregation between people of North Korea and the US, as we will conflict. Secondly, there will be no freedom of expressing ideas; people will be restricted to speak some of the contentious issues of the society. Thirdly, War will lead to starvation that will be brought by humanitarian emergencies due to lack of basic needs. Fourthly, there will be the establishment of the prisoners of war; innocent citizens will be used as human shield hence leading to civilian casualties. Fifthly, there will be border restrictions, where people will be barred from accessing the United States ("The Argument For War With North Korea Is No Argument At All n.p).

Works Cited

"Should America Go To War With North Korea?." Debate.Org, 2017, http://www.debate.org/opinions/should-america-go-to-war-with-north-korea.

"The Argument For War With North Korea Is No Argument At All." Time, 2017, http://time.com/4926815/north-korea-war-us/.

Amstutz, Mark R. International ethics: concepts, theories, and cases in global politics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2013.