Literature Review Resources on Leadership

Organizing the sources is a critical aspect of research writing. The referencing is a software tool for managing the citation process. To get more information on the process of signing up for the free, voluntary Reference account of work an individual may review the link below:

http://libguides.gcu.edu/refworksandendnoteNumber Article Information Added to Ref Works? Y or N (optional)

Bekelman, J. E., Li, Y., & Gross, C. P. (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. Jama, 289(4), 454-465. https://iims.uthscsa.edu/sites/iims/files/EthicalIssues-10.pdf.

Bekelman, Li, and Gross write the journal "Scope and impact of financial conflict of interest in biomedical research" on behalf of the Jama organization. The memoir written in 20003 examines the effects of conflict caused by financial disagreements to the leadership of a team. Mostly, the journal is more reliable because of the outstanding reputation of the authors who are well known and experienced in the field. However, being the second work, it might alter the original information as intended by the first author. In such an event, the information may not be accurate due to the language used and the context.

Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 270-283. http://shop.tarjomeplus.com/Uploads/site1/DownloadDoc/1027.pdf.

The 2013 journal Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust written by Braun, Peus, Weisweiler and Frey on behalf of the leadership quarterly focuses on the establishment of transformational leadership that enhances team performance and job satisfaction within the organization. The journal is dependable because of the writers' experience. The second work is, however, prone to be disadvantageous because of a possibility of data alteration in the review process.

Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The leadership quarterly, 17(6), 595-616. http://www.academia.edu/download/49434258/j.leaqua.2006.10.00420161007-6480-gswjde.pdf.

Ethical leadership: A review and future directions is done by Brown and Trevino on behalf of the leadership quarterly to examine the need and the challenges that come with ethics in the leadership process. Although it dates back to 2006, the journal is highly relevant to the topic as it gives a clear focus on the future directions that. Just like the other selected journals, the ethical leadership is a product of experienced and outstanding writers of the 21st century. On the other hand, is for information to change I the process of review and prevent originality to some extent.

Carasco-Saul, M., Kim, W., & Kim, T. (2015). Leadership and employee engagement: Proposing research agendas through a review of the literature. Human Resource Development Review, 14(1), 38-63. http://www.academia.edu/download/42635924/Employee_Engagement.pdf.

In 2015, Carasco-Saul, and Kim wrote the leadership and employee engagement journal on behalf of the human resource development to assist in the understanding of the leadership structure through proposing the various research agenda. The experience of the authors and its relevance to the leadership topic makes it relevant to the research. According to the authors, leadership is a fundamental aspect of development that determines the relationship between the management and the employees of any organization. Therefore, the administration must take up the roles and lead the team to achieve the desired objectives.

Donaldson, S. I., & Ko, I. (2010). Positive organizational psychology, behavior, and scholarship: A review of the emerging literature and evidence base. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(3), 177-191. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ia_Ko/publication/228669218_Positive_organizational_psychology_behavior_and_scholarship_A_review_of_the_emerging_literature_and_evidence_base/links/0deec52c56bfb8b1fe000000.pdf.

Donaldson and Kos 2010 journal of positive psychology focuses on the behavior, psychology, and scholarship of the leadership. It tends to determine a minimum standard of education level that organizational leaders ought to have and subsequent character they should emulate. The journal is relevant to the research study and dependable as well. The experience and outstanding reputation of both Donaldson and Ko make it among the best journal on leadership. Although the authors have the experience, the challenge of language and context may distort information to some extent thereby reducing the level of originality.

6.Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120-1145. http://www.academia.edu/download/42231536/Authentic_leadership_A_review_of_the_lit20160206-14055-1wgd4eq.pdf.

The 20 11 peers reviewed journal by Gardner, Cogliser, Davis, and Dickens about Authentic leadership was a product done on behalf of the lairdship quarterly. The journal reviews the literature and research agenda for the leadership quarterly as a way of adding value to the existing information concerning organizational leadership. Just like the other selected journals, it is a product of qualified individuals and is therefore relevant and helpful to the research. Just like the other peer-reviewed journal, the probability of data distortion is high because the second authors may not have the original information and the knowledge that prompted such information.

7. Harms, P. D., Crede, M., Tynan, M., Leon, M., & Jeung, W. (2017). Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review. The leadership quarterly, 28(1), 178-194. http://daneshyari.com/article/preview/5035245.pdf.

In 2017, Harms, Crede, Tynan, Leon, & Jeung reviewed the leadership quality journal and focused on "leadership and stress" as the title. The journal reflects the high level of competence and reputation of the authors and therefore provided very relevant information to the research. Despite the experience of the authors, there is a possibility of data loss and information interference because of language change and third-party intervention.

8. Jean-Marie, G., Normore, A. H., & Brooks, J. S. (2009). Leadership for social justice: Preparing 21st-century school leaders for new social order. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 4(1), 1-31. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2c76/4ea52745dd30a11271e8954977fecbbc4591.pdf.

Jean-Marie Normore and Brooks are the authors of the Leadership for social justice journal done in 2009. The material examines and gives an approach to the determination of the best leaders of the 21st century. It also describes the present social orders that leaders use in their daily operations to create change in the society. It is relevant and helpful to the proposed research study being a journal of research and leadership education. The experience of the authors is an advantage even though the possibility of information distortion may not is present.

9.Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of business ethics, 113(3), 377-393. http://sahayaselvam.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Paris-Peachey-2013-Sys-Lit-Review-on-Leadership.pdf.

The 2013 Parris and Peachey review of the journal of business ethics was a structured review of the literature regarding the theory of servant leadership. It promotes the idea that the leaders are also the servant of the people and is in office to serve the interest of the people. It is a relevant document to the r5esesrcgh done by qualified individuals.

10. Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Hartog, D. N. D., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(23), 259-278. http://ron-piccolo.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/2010-JOB-EL-JCT-Piccolo-et-al1.pdf.

The relationship between ethical and core job characteristic is a journal done by Piccolo, Greenbaum, Hartog, and Folger in 2010 to add value to the journal of organizational behavior. It can distort information and present a different ides just like many other peers reviewed journals. However, the experience and competence of the authors make it relevant to the research.

References

Bekelman, J. E., Li, Y., & Gross, C. P. (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. Jama, 289(4), 454-465. https://iims.uthscsa.edu/sites/iims/files/EthicalIssues-10.pdf.

Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 270-283. http://shop.tarjomeplus.com/Uploads/site-1/DownloadDoc/1027.pdf.

Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The leadership quarterly, 17(6), 595-616. http://www.academia.edu/download/49434258/j.leaqua.2006.10.00420161007-6480-gswjde.pdf.

Carasco-Saul, M., Kim, W., & Kim, T. (2015). Leadership and employee engagement: Proposing research agendas through a review of the literature. Human Resource Development Review, 14(1), 38-63. http://www.academia.edu/download/42635924/Employee_Engagement.pdfDonaldson, S. I., & Ko, I. (2010). Positive organizational psychology, behavior, and scholarship: A review of the emerging literature and evidence base. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(3), 177-191. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ia_Ko/publication/228669218_Positive_organizational_psychology_behavior_and_scholarship_A_review_of_the_emerging_literature_and_evidence_base/links/0deec52c56bfb8b1fe000000.pdf.

Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120-1145. http://www.academia.edu/download/42231536/Authentic_leadership_A_review_of_the_lit20160206-14055-1wgd4eq.pdf.

Harms, P. D., Crede, M., Tynan, M., Leon, M., & Jeung, W. (2017). Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review. The leadership quarterly, 28(1), 178-194. http://daneshyari.com/article/preview/5035245.pdf.

Jean-Marie, G., Normore, A. H., & Brooks, J. S. (2009). Leadership for social justice: Preparing 21st-century school leaders for new social order. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 4(1), 1-31. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2c76/4ea52745dd30a11271e8954977fecbbc4591.pdf.

Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of business ethics, 113(3), 377-393. http://sahayaselvam.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Paris-Peachey-2013-Sys-Lit-Review-on-Leadership.pdf.

Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Hartog, D. N. D., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(23), 259-278. http://ron-piccolo.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/2010-JOB-EL-JCT-Piccolo-et-al1.pdf.