Any endeavor that results in a death like killing remains devastating in every aspect. Therefore, every factor that constitutes it can only attract a wrong conclusion. It is on such a background that this paper endeavors to showcases reasons as to why killing is always wrong. It will discuss the wrong nature of killing from the proposition of ethics, law and humanity perspectives.
Killing constitutes death whose impact remains tragic in the lives of the bereaved. Ethically, any action that results in maleficence gets discouraged as it does not constitute virtuous and moral character that ethics endeavor to advance in people. Therefore, killing is always wrong as it does not advance the ethical concept of virtue and moral character. Kant proposed a maxim where an action can get regarded as virtuous and ethical to the extent that it constitutes a universal standard for executing issues (Meagher 21). However, the ethical constraints that persist with killing render it unethical and consequently a wrong action that lacks the universal maxim of Kant. The burial expenses that killing results to the bereaved makes it a wrong action. Ethical acts get described from the beneficence impact that it creates to the recipient. However, killing constitutes tragic loss that cannot compare to any reasonable endeavor of ethics. It is such a premise that killing always remains a wrong act.
Legally, life gets construed as sacred. Despite the unavoidable circumstances that may result in instances of killing, the universal charter on human rights prohibits any act that leads to loss of life. The law prohibits any form of killing whether through deliberate murder or accidental manslaughter. Additionally, all forms of killings executed through deliberate suicide or homicide get abhorred by the constitution. There persist various legislations that support life and endeavor to discourage issues that may constitute killing (Casey 24). The universal charter on human rights construes life as an inherent right. Despite the provision of euthanasia as a form of a deliberate act of killing, some countries still abhor it. Therefore, killing constitutes a criminal offense in many jurisdictions universally. It is at such a juncture that killing always remains a wrong procedure.
The humanity perspective of killing does not approve issues or actions that may result in taking away life from any person. The reasons attached to such a proposition ranges from emotional and psychological concerns among others. The general pain associated with the killing process constitutes its wrong nature with many people. For instance, killing process realizes massive pain to the victims especially in instances of brutal force (Kelly et al. 32). Additionally, the bereaved that suffer the loss occasioned by killing suffer emotional and psychological pain. The death that is realized through killing also constitutes a state of hopelessness into the victims and their relatives which contradicts humanity principle of empathy. Killing also results in instances of hate which offends humanity virtues. Further, killing tendencies constitutes inhumane traits that offend the ordered nature of society. The concerns above explain why killing is always wrong (Bruce 14).
In summary, killing always remains a wrong cause that should never get pursued whatsoever. For instance, its wrong nature persists and showcases from the proposition of humanity, legal and ethical perspectives. Therefore, this paper has advanced a discussion highlighting the wrong nature of killing from the factors above. Finally, the general pain, immorality, and emotional imbalance that killing realizes explain why it always remains a wrong cause.
Â
Works Cited
Bruce, James E. Rights in the Law: The Importance of God's Free Choices in the Thought of Francis Turretin. , 2013. Print.
Casey, Kim. Thunder Bay City's True Murder Investigations 1882 to 2014. Cork: Book Baby, 2014. Internet Resource.
Kelly, David F, Gerard Magill, and H. Have. Contemporary Catholic Health Care Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2013. Internet Resource.
Meagher, Robert E. Killing from the Inside Out: Moral Injury and Just War. , 2014. Print.
Â
Request Removal
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the thesishelpers.org website, please click below to request its removal:
- Essay Sample on Ethics
- Natural Philosophy by Nicholas Maxwell - Book Review Example
- Religion Essay Sample: Proofs for Gods Existence
- Critical Analysis: A Letter to the Town of Providence by Roger Williams
- Sexuality and Morality in Christianity - Thesis Example
- Argumentative Essay Example: Innate Ideas in Philosophy
- Essay Sample on Theory of Knowledge