Is Tragedy Compatible With Christianity? - Research Paper Example

It is presumed that, even though there happens to have Christian drama, in all Christian philosophies and Christian poetry none of them have a fundamental usage of this kind of the expression " Christian Tragedy" within their scope of disposal. For instance in this dramatic book entitled as The Vision of Tragedy Richard made a formal point that, in the viewpoint of canon, Christianity at all times reverses the tragic ideas and then makes tragedy unattainable. On the other hand, he said that also it is less formal where the idea of tragedy is not part and parcel of Christian with no means will never be. However, for such terminologies of Christian tragedy has no or lack the close relationship with those who are pure Christians; this is because it has been confirmed that, such terms in most cases involves treacherous ambiguities. However, it is authentic that, for any expression to engross perilous ambiguities it does not need it to be nonsensical. Therefore, this paper examines Christian presumptions of tragedy and how thy exploit such kind of ambiguities within their scope of disposal. Also, another major concern of this paper is to reflect on the temperament of dramatic tragedy in a very literary approach as from the viewpoint of what is comprehended within the heart of the Christian theology.

The most common theory of the dramatic tragedy was founded by Aristotle within his sole Poetics. At this point, therefore, I will attempt to talk like a Christian with a major concern to exhibit poetics of Aristotle which needs a total revolution in the radiance of the differing. On the other hand, to most knowledge and understanding, both Hume and Kant tried to offer a philosophic foundation for instance, Kant has to be remembered for his raising positive motives on the creator of the earth and universe and the profound description of ferment genius while Hume he emphasized alongside the authentic Christian audience upon his top message (Reich berg, 2018).

Within human exposure and particularly Christians, it can or cannot be correct to say that, it is all by religious to face east when the direction is directed towards nonexistence. Thus human denial and the reality of human suffering that leads to death is only for such had proved beyond tout inhospitably to tragedy. However, this is certainly an incredible fact that Christianity in authentic practice and from time immemorial has offered a matrix in which has come to be affirmed in many Christian occasions within their scope of disposal. This has been seen in the start of Renaissance where a prodigious volume of tragic expression was witnessed. This was not experienced in literature field, but it was as well witnessed in music, painting and sculpture (Rubin, 2018).

Additionally, contention over and over again leads to a question as well as one query within Christian exposure is bound to a lot of concern to the past references: why is it that even though for many millennium Christian intelligentsia carried out means of reconciling Christian along with Greek inheritances? Was it that because it was metaphysical values of Aristotle relatively than his model of the tragedy that preoccupied Aquinas hence by him much of Christian nation? The fact remains that there will lack any particular sufficient declaration to fully answer such types of questions (Nivalainen, 2018). However, the accessibility of texts had remained one crucial factor to consider where Christians think of it or not or much of Christian thoughts are about pertinent writings of Aristotle or of Christians of Aeschylus, Euripides as well as Sophocles. Another issue as well remains that whether when there is absence of suitable dramatic traditions can be either cause or effect of the whole matter; it is unquestionably to be one cofactor among others

The general issue remains a reality that whether from time immemorial, there had been general or particular features of varieties of the Christian theology as well as Christian practices with an era of post Renaissance nation as being compared along with the earlier ages that made Christendom more cordial to the tragic phrase. On the other hand, Christians are confronted with a question that is impregnably cosmic and then at most, it reflects on the major aim of this particular paper. Nevertheless, there is one general point that could be registered as most important. As such, it had been foreshadowed to refer Sewell's that freedom of Christian expression is not tired up within tragedy points of traditional factors (Hubbell, 2018).

By considering the virtue of the fact that poetics of Aristotle has remained one of the best work the criticism literature within West, a theory of Christian dramatic tragedy should start by attempting to outline dispassionately aspects of Aristotle's work that are normative to most of Christian theology. To start with, I cannot imagine that theology of Christian can presume, imply or express sweeping impertinence for the poetics of Aristotle. Aristotle offers a unique point of departure from where most of constructive Christian's efforts should begin from. Also, Aristotle's poetics offers text in which theology of Christians might offer the emendations (Cover, 2018).

Similarly, I can't think that dramatic strategy of Christian theory can be well constructed apart from some formal terminologies as well as principles that were formulated and introduced in the work of Aristotle. There are elements of abstract and formal in Aristotle's work thus it is exhaustively to say for example no any dramatic tragedy theory which can fail to make general. This is because, distinctions of Aristotelian between motive of a creator, the structure and the inner content of the work being composed along with the effect and the demand on the audience. For such poet, work provides a formal setting in which literary theory should work from. On the other hand, all discussions of dramatic tragedy should recognize six formal elements and such elements are not limited to plot, though, character, diction, melody as well as spectacles (Moberly, 2018).

The third point is that; there lack a proper reason supposing that Aristotle warned out elements that of literature from a formal stand. I as well believe that Christian theology should insist that Aristotles poetics were all constructed purely from a theology of Greeks. This might be either indirectly or directly, unconsciously or consciously where Aristotle interpreted using formal principles having some basic elements insight Greek theology as well as religiousness within his head. However, as by nature, literature is more concerned with beginning internal truths same as philosophy and science. The perspective of God same as the ideal rather than authentic entity by observing the course of occasions hence lacking passions from beyond and above. People in many cases they feel insecure and terror for the reason that, the consequences of any tragic occurrence are stubborn, irreversible and remorseless (Bret haut, 2018).

Another point is that I dont think that theology of Christians is the sole feasible theological stance from which Aristotle could be amended. For example, it is possible to seek for qualification from Greek premises of theology itself than seeking from outside. On the other hand, Aristotle doesnt render complete impartiality to either literary Aeschylean structure or theological content or dramatic tragedy of Euripidean.

To sum up, poetics of Aristotle has both positive and negative general implications for the theology of Christians. For negative implications, what is informal within his work can or cannot be authentic from Christian point of view. Also, Christian hero of tragic is the way of profane and immoral. Thus the idea of tragic hero expresses characteristic of aristocratic Greek theme of the dignity of man's suffering. While positive general implications for the theology of Christians mean that, Aristotles criticism given prototype genuine for poetics of Christians; Aristotle offers a unique point of departure from where most of constructive Christian's efforts should begin from. Also, Aristotle's poetics offers text in which theology of Christians might offer the emendations. Thus theologically, Christian tragedy was fulfilled through God's provision of Jesus Christ as He died on the cross. Thus human denial and the reality of human suffering that leads to death is only for such had proved beyond tout inhospitably to tragedy. However, this is certainly an incredible fact that Christianity in authentic practice and from time immemorial has offered a matrix in which has come to be affirmed in many Christian occasions within their scope of disposal.

References

Brethaut, C. (2018). Transboundary Water Management: From Geopolitics to a Non-state Analytical Perspective: The Case of the Rhone River. In A Critical Approach to International Water Management Trends (pp. 71-95). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Cover, M. B. (2018). The Death of Tragedy: The Form of God in Euripides's Bacchae and Paul's Carmen Christi. Harvard Theological Review, 111(1), 66-89.

Hubbell, J. A. (2018). Metaphysical Plays of Domination and Freedom. In Byron's Nature (pp. 155-202). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Moberly, R. W. L. (2018). The Bible in a Disenchanted Age (Theological Explorations for the Church Catholic): The Enduring Possibility of Christian Faith. Baker Books.

Nivalainen, M. (2018). Adorno's tragic vision. Jyvaskyla studies in education, psychology and social research 600.

Reichberg, G. M. (2018). Jacques Maritain: Christian Theorist of Non-Violence and Just War. Journal of Military Ethics, 1-19.

Rubin, D. (2018). Holy Russia, sacred Israel: Jewish-Christian encounters in Russian religious thought. Academic Studies Press.